7summits forum!

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Stupid Question: Everest and Lhotse  (Read 8362 times)

jedi-knight

  • Scrambler
  • ***
  • Altitude: 1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 75
Stupid Question: Everest and Lhotse
« on: Feb 14 2006, 11:55 »

hey folks,

i have a stupid question to ask. i read that the South Col on Everest actually links Everest to Lhotse, and that Lhotse can be considered Everest's secondary peak.

if that is the case, does it mean that we can summit two 8000ers at one go? summit Lhotse, then Everest or vice versa.

what say you mountaineers?

 ;D
Logged
Do or Do Not...There is No Try!

toffee_monkey

  • Toffee Monkey
  • Hiker
  • **
  • Altitude: -3
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
    • The Everest Pixel Dream
Re: Stupid Question: Everest and Lhotse
« Reply #1 on: Feb 14 2006, 14:21 »

Jedi Knight,

It is possible to climb both Lhotse & Everest in one expedition, but this is extremely rare. Anatoli Boukreev achieved this feat in 1996 after the infamous storm which claimed 8 lives. After an ascent of Everest because your body is acclimatised to the altitide it is possible to ascend back through the icefall and through the western cwm up Lhotse in quick time. However you would need to be incredibly determined and fit to achieve two 8000 metre summits on one expedition.

Its achievable but difficult.

Most expedions which camp at Base Camp on the Khumbu glacier will attempt either Everest or Lhotse, not both together. It is hard enough just getting up one of them let alone two.

Logged
Toffee Monkey
7 Summit Tee Shirts on eBay.
http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Toffee-Monkey-UK
sales@toffeemonkey.com
Quote
Aconcagua, Everest designs in store, NOW!!

MikeW

  • Climber
  • ****
  • Altitude: 13
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 167
  • To be is to climb!
Re: Stupid Question: Everest and Lhotse
« Reply #2 on: Feb 14 2006, 21:25 »

Hey JK!

You need to go back down to basecamp if you want the second summit to count (technically, because you would still be standing on top of the mountain!!!). Because you need the mountain to be climbed from basecamp to the summit. And btw it is not considered a secondary peak because of the distance that separates it from Everest.

MikeW
Logged

Scott Patterson

  • Armchair...
  • *
  • Altitude: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
  • I am too lazy to change this text!
Re: Stupid Question: Everest and Lhotse
« Reply #3 on: Oct 3 2006, 23:08 »

if that is the case, does it mean that we can summit two 8000ers at one go? summit Lhotse, then Everest or vice versa.

No one has ever climbed Lhotse via the South Col.    The route is too difficult.     You would have to descend and climb the couloir above the Lhotse Face.

You need to go back down to basecamp if you want the second summit to count (technically, because you would still be standing on top of the mountain!!!).
 


I disagree.    You would have to descend down the Lhotse Face quite aways from the South Col anyway to climb Lhotse, and if you did do it from the South Col, you would have solved one of the problems on the "Everest Horseshoe".       Anyone doing that deserves a huge amount of credit and could certainly count it.
 
 
Logged

MoT

  • Climber
  • ****
  • Altitude: 8
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 247
    • TightropeNET
Re: Stupid Question: Everest and Lhotse
« Reply #4 on: Oct 3 2006, 23:17 »

You can climb Lhotse Middle from the south-col

http://www.russianclimb.com/middle_lhotse.html

But I'd doubt Lhotse Main can be done from there - I reckon it would've been attempted and completed by now if it could
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 23 queries.